imagine if there was a community of researchers meeting THIS WEEK who almost only talked about psychological theories that were specified as detailed computational models and who fought over those models incrementally for decades at a time: oh hai #CogSci2018 #iccmpsyched
https://twitter.com/theamygdaloid/status/1021854485575032832 …
-
-
Replying to @djnavarro @todd_gureckis
The sad truth is — like the meme above directly states — MANY PEOPLE literally ignore theoretical work in cogsci/psych.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
So like those essays will be written all the time because in part people do not listen/read/whatever, I guess. In a sense the essays are needed to be written because they are needed to be read but I doubt that final step happens.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Regardless, that essay should have talked more about people who do the good work. Credit where credit is due.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I was also surprised by Denny’s take because I recall his own work is quite theoretical and model-based.https://dennyborsboom.com
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Perhaps he's basically trying to say "this is the path to take" — but forgot to say "others walk it already"?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
PS: forgot to say, so cool — that meme, Danielle!
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Also to be fair to Denny, some amazing points raised, e.g., http://osc.centerforopenscience.org/2013/11/20/theoretical-amnesia/#comment-1205803412 …
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.