imagine if there was a community of researchers meeting THIS WEEK who almost only talked about psychological theories that were specified as detailed computational models and who fought over those models incrementally for decades at a time: oh hai #CogSci2018 #iccmpsyched
https://twitter.com/theamygdaloid/status/1021854485575032832 …
-
-
PS: forgot to say, so cool — that meme, Danielle!
-
Also to be fair to Denny, some amazing points raised, e.g., http://osc.centerforopenscience.org/2013/11/20/theoretical-amnesia/#comment-1205803412 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Did not read his message that way even though I had a strong prior that that is what he was going to say:https://twitter.com/irisvanrooij/status/1013144411386064896?s=21 …
-
Perhaps it was strategic that he left it implicit. But I see discussion here on twitter about how psychology is not ready for / has no good theoretical work etc. & this feeds into that.
-
It seems that experimental (social) psychologists often think of ‘theory’ = ‘trying to sell bad research practices’. At least, that is the impression I get if I raise the isue of ‘theory’ in convos. I need to think of different words ...
-
Agreed. It's painful to read that but it's what they say IMHO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

