And everything that came before that should not be taken into account? The literal brainwashing / programming that is essential to military training (or any kind of institutionalised grouping) should not be considered? 
OK, and what you do suggest we do about those who don't deprogram?
-
-
All this time you have been defending them... so you defend those who don't change and continue to want to kill people for genocidal reasons because? Because they might change? But you just said they won't change? So what will you do for/with them?
-
I assume by "you just said they won't change" you mean that I acknowledged some Nazis cant be deprogrammed? Ok, that is true. What you do with them depends entirely on what they have done in the name of Nazism.
-
I'm going to leave you alone because I really feel it's pointless.
-
Damn straight. Why even bother if ur gna consistently treat me like the enemy (& incidentally, promote that to a whole bunch of followers). If ur so keen on Nazi-punching, I suggest spending ur time doing that instead of arguing w/ someone who agrees with u on almost everything!
-
I think the main problem here is that there was an equivocation about the term good and bad, where one person said Nazis are bad, meaning it from an objective ethical standpoint, and someone else said they are only bad from a morally relativist standpoint.
-
And this is the problem, Nazis don't see themselves as the bad guys, and will jump on any presented opportunity to demonstrate their positive self image using weak arguments like moral relativism. It's a foot in the door, and from that foot, they will build. Don't open the door
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.