Individuals are the microbes living in guts of the body of social infrastructure. There are as many microbes as human cells in the body but we dont consider human behaviour an expression of those microbes. Pops shd be considered as macroorganisms, independent of component parts.
-
-
At what point does it cross the line into thought-crime though? Or pre-crime? That's the thing...
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
We already have "pre-crime" crimes. If you threaten somebody that is a crime. As is preparing, e.g., a terrorist attack. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offences_Against_the_Person_Act_1861#Threats_to_kill …
-
And do you support this? My point is that there has to be a line beyond which you will not cross...
-
I don't cross the line you seem to have which is that some people are inherently;l bad. But why does even ethical point need to be also a legal one?
-
Quite the opposite. I dont think *anyone* is inherently good or bad & it solves nothing to consider every torch-bearing US Fascist as 'evil' & shd be punched/killed: the social factors that led them there must be considered. I cannot agree w the dichotomisation of human behaviour
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.