Individuals, yes. Populations, no.
-
-
And there are people who are seemingly bad people, but to argue it's an unchangeable characteristic of their personality seems pointless debate IMHO. Some people, e.g., Nazis, do need to be punched/killed, of course.
-
At what point does it cross the line into thought-crime though? Or pre-crime? That's the thing...
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
We already have "pre-crime" crimes. If you threaten somebody that is a crime. As is preparing, e.g., a terrorist attack. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offences_Against_the_Person_Act_1861#Threats_to_kill …
-
And do you support this? My point is that there has to be a line beyond which you will not cross...
-
I don't cross the line you seem to have which is that some people are inherently;l bad. But why does even ethical point need to be also a legal one?
-
Quite the opposite. I dont think *anyone* is inherently good or bad & it solves nothing to consider every torch-bearing US Fascist as 'evil' & shd be punched/killed: the social factors that led them there must be considered. I cannot agree w the dichotomisation of human behaviour
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.