I don't worry too much what cis men think on this topic, but thanks for explaining.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @PsychScientists
Iris van Rooij Retweeted Iris van Rooij
The discussion worth having here is why people want to give legitimacy to fallacious arguments and ‘debate’ the gender identities of vulnerable minorities.https://twitter.com/irisvanrooij/status/1019338557247447040?s=21 …
Iris van Rooij added,
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Hey
@PsychScientists please listen to Olivia and Iris on this. Jack H/lberstam and other TERFs use that kind of rhetoric to erase NB folks all the time. It’s fundamentally dehumanizing to speak about NB folx in the way the article does.1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
I’ll absolutely take this on board. I’m very much not looking to be a dick here. I have some concerns about some bandwagons, but I’m mostly interested in not harming anyone
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @djnavarro @PsychScientists and
Iris van Rooij Retweeted Iris van Rooij
Iris van Rooij added,
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @djnavarro and
Yeah I have Stock’s stuff bookmarked to read; with a critical eye, promise :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Even the word "critical" is ruined by TERFs. They use "gender critical" as code for their blatant and aggressive transmisogyny.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.