I'd also say, that your comments were short statements of fact. If they came across agressive that's kinda because the recipient found those facts uncomfortable and you knew that when making them. Calling you angry to deflect from this felt like 100% projection to me
-
-
Replying to @Erysiphales @Psycholosopher and
Totally you should run experimental design by Twitter before doing it, else everyone will critique it if they don't like the results! Happy to RT the design to get input.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrAnneCarpenter @Erysiphales and
Two options I can think of: 1) Relabel everyone as Person A, B, C and ask "who is more emotional" (or angry/aggressive) 2) Swap identities randomly (so sometimes men are me etc) and ask "is the last comment more emotional than the others in the thread?" (or angry/aggressive)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrAnneCarpenter @Erysiphales and
I suspect (2) might be better - with 1 I think I'd be labeled 'worst' (even if minutely so) regardless of whether ppl know I'm female or not. Not really getting at the Q. (p.s. in (1) you'd also run a parallel test where people DO keep their identities)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrAnneCarpenter @Erysiphales and
Hmm. What about presenting a bunch of the replies, and for each you get to choose from a list of adjectives to describe the reply. I think any ranking yours might end up 'worst' simply because it's the most pointed. Whilst not emotional, it *elicits* an emotional response...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrDeCaluwe @DrAnneCarpenter and
Just so you know, collecting data on MTurk if you have never done it before is a much bigger time commitments than a single evening. You need JS, PHP, and SQL usually and at least.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @DrDeCaluwe and
Wut? I wasn’t thinking this would be an actual published study. If you just throw some screenshots of the tweets together, it should take less than a day
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Psycholosopher @DrDeCaluwe and
The languages I mentioned are just used to collect the data.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @Psycholosopher and
I'm sure nobody means to but to assume what we do to (I'm lucky enough to not have to do it myself) to collect data in psych is easy is kind of offensive.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Psycholosopher and
Either way, here's a tutorial if you are curious: "I've put together a series of tutorials to help experimental psychologists learn to code Turk studies using HTML, CSS and Javascript (with jQuery)." https://bradylab.ucsd.edu/ttt/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And the tutorial won't even explain how to control for confounds and actually design a goo experiment. For that you will probably have to just do it easy way and just go do a PhD in Exp Psych as over Twitter I can't really mentor you appropriately. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.