I think there's a larger issue to be considered, which is respecting trans men's identities as men. Do organizers really want to say (even implicitly) we don't think you're really men? That's how it could be read in another phrasing. So, it could be read as respectful of them.
-
-
Replying to @djnavarro
I agree with the statement that if it really is “all gender minorities” as such, then they could be clearer—and maybe just use that phrase.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djnavarro @DrCharlotteTate
This is by the by really as I'm sure you both agree/know but "non-binary" includes people who are, yes, as mentioned "combinations" of the existing binary genders but also agender people and people who most certainly don't see their gender as defined by the existing binary.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @djnavarro @DrCharlotteTate
It's very personal what language you want to use about yourself and our language is so inherently binarist and cisheterosexist so it makes sense we struggle. Get well soon! 
1:00 AM - 3 Jul 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.