I think I said somewhere up thread that I agree that these things are weighted -- and fwiw I think there should just be a proceedings papers section, not like people should take it off their cvs entirely
-
-
Reread your post now. Guess I misread it, because the quote-tweet (or: the ‘fooling yourselves’) seemed to change focus. IMHO so much wrong atm with the academic system that I do not even know where to start in helping aleviate imposter syndrome.
-
Twitter is so hard sometimes. I would love it if proceedings in our field could be treated like journal articles but the way some people use them seems damaging, or at least confusing, to others.
-
At the end of the day if one call the CV section "publications" instead of "journal articles" it's tiny but I think it can help to make younglings less confused... At least it's more descriptive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
), so I’m surprised to see this high number (have not been able to attend lately). In any event, I understand those visceral reactions—same.