Sure -- but if we want to trust the quality of the research, 90% of the things I've reviewed for cogsci are pretty sloppy, and the idea that they weigh as much as something that's gone through multiple rounds of revision is questionable
-
-
Replying to @djnavarro @todd_gureckis and
I think I said somewhere up thread that I agree that these things are weighted -- and fwiw I think there should just be a proceedings papers section, not like people should take it off their cvs entirely
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @djnavarro @BayesForDays and
Been following the discussion, thanks. I recall acceptance rates of cogsci used to be much lower (35%, but perhaps that for talks only?
), so I’m surprised to see this high number (have not been able to attend lately). In any event, I understand those visceral reactions—same.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @djnavarro and
Recently, when I made a new website I chose to put a few selected papers on top of my publication list. Criteria for me were: 1) give a quick impression of my work and 2) for me important papers (& I guess ones I am proud of). One of the papers is a cogsci proceedings paper.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @djnavarro and
I can't tell if this is in disagreement with my quoted tweet or not (another reason to dislike quote tweeting in many cases) but FWIW I don't think anybody in this thread is part of the problem I was referring to.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @djnavarro and
Not disagreeing with you Olivia; just adding to considerations expressed by Danielle. Got me thinking about how I see this myself.>>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Possibly my experiences with both seeing people playing the system getting rewarded & others doing amazing and important work not being credited (because they do not meet absurd simplistic one-dimensial metrics) have shaped my perspective.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @djnavarro and
I'm not sure my experiences disagree with yours. I do worry when phd students look at a person only slightly ahead (like a final year phd student) with many cogsci proceedings and think this is 10 "journal articles" and get stressed and think they are failing at writing stuff.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
There's nothing I can do but say "that's proceedings" and hope it reaches those who don't come to me, I think. The stereotype threat seems not to be caused by somebody with a couple proceedings in the "journal articles" but with 10s of them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.