73% acceptance with only one round?
-
-
Replying to @djnavarro @todd_gureckis and
Sure -- but if we want to trust the quality of the research, 90% of the things I've reviewed for cogsci are pretty sloppy, and the idea that they weigh as much as something that's gone through multiple rounds of revision is questionable
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djnavarro @todd_gureckis and
I think I said somewhere up thread that I agree that these things are weighted -- and fwiw I think there should just be a proceedings papers section, not like people should take it off their cvs entirely
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @djnavarro @BayesForDays and
Been following the discussion, thanks. I recall acceptance rates of cogsci used to be much lower (35%, but perhaps that for talks only?
), so I’m surprised to see this high number (have not been able to attend lately). In any event, I understand those visceral reactions—same.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @djnavarro and
Recently, when I made a new website I chose to put a few selected papers on top of my publication list. Criteria for me were: 1) give a quick impression of my work and 2) for me important papers (& I guess ones I am proud of). One of the papers is a cogsci proceedings paper.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @djnavarro and
I can't tell if this is in disagreement with my quoted tweet or not (another reason to dislike quote tweeting in many cases) but FWIW I don't think anybody in this thread is part of the problem I was referring to.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If people have ideas as to better address the issue I raised I'd love to hear them. If maybe it's better to just let phd students figure it out for themselves (not sure this always helps) I'm open to discussing that idea too. But I would like to help them with impostor syndrome.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @djnavarro and
Perhaps then I misunderstood your question. This was not clear from the OP to me. What is the question we can help PhDs with? Then I’ll think more ‘on topic’.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.