the journal is fine but the conference? y'all are fooling yourselves
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
I've seriously been saying this for years, this is a real sticking point for me
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BayesForDays @o_guest
In my mind cogsci proceedings are papers you couldn't get published elsewhere
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BayesForDays @o_guest
I don't know about this, a lot of work first published in CogSci proceedings is later published in "prestigious" journals
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @tallinzen @o_guest
If it's published later in a journal then that's one thing. But that doesn't make cogsci proceedings a paper.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's enough to convince comp ling CV readers though, apparently. And gussy up an ACL paper enough and you can make it a journal paper too if anyone cares.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @asayeed @BayesForDays and
This is a big culture difference but it works in favour of CL people dabbling in psych and against the reverse (since presumably psych people don't realize that ACL is srs bzns).
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Maybe I'm too idealistic but I'd hope that if you do research where it makes sense to publish both in psych journals and in ACL your letter writers will find a way to convey that to the promotion committee :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Promotion is a different story from a freeform CV for public consumption or to get attention in the pool of job applicants though. In many places applications for promotions, grants, etc have a format.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Yeah. That's a totally different ballgame. Agreed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
