Periodic reminder that CogSci papers are not real papershttps://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1009153043508662272 …
-
Show this thread
-
the journal is fine but the conference? y'all are fooling yourselves
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @o_guest
I've seriously been saying this for years, this is a real sticking point for me
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BayesForDays @o_guest
In my mind cogsci proceedings are papers you couldn't get published elsewhere
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BayesForDays @o_guest
I don't know about this, a lot of work first published in CogSci proceedings is later published in "prestigious" journals
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @tallinzen @o_guest
If it's published later in a journal then that's one thing. But that doesn't make cogsci proceedings a paper.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The simple fact that you can publish it twice makes it not a paper.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Either way if it inflates your "journal articles" it's not exactly truthful...
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @BayesForDays
Absolutely, you shouldn't put proceedings papers in the journal articles section.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

