Big thanks to all for all the useful ideas!
Trying again!
https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1005781049195073536 …
-
-
there have been a few over the years--most tend to point to blog posts and Mendeley readership as being the most predictive of future citations in most fields. do you need links to the studies themselves? we'd be happy to send them!
-
Cool. Sure!
-
Here you go! (Warning--loads of links coming your way...) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-011-0580-x … https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 … http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171371 … http://altmetrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/altmetrics16_paper_5.pdf … http://wlv.openrepository.com/wlv/bitstream/2436/621193/1/Early+readers+correlate+with+later+citations1hPreprint.pdf … https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.10311.pdf … Believe it or not, this is not an exhaustive list!
-
Oh, wow! Thank you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mendeley does not contribute to the score
-
OK, let me phrase it differently then: replace "score" with "things Altmetric tracks".
-
It is just interesting that Altmetric score does not include all metrics they track and weights them differently :)
-
It is! Thanks for pointing that out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
I really appreciate all the support from you and others!