Blog Post? Likely, one had the room. But a tweet? Maybe they have to conserve space. It's all about, “one had how much space available what one did or didn't do with it.”
-
-
-
It's a pretty long post. Loads of figures lifted from the paper, no proper reference included.
-
Uhm.. you mean the published paper is not cited from the later blog post?
-
Not in a way that includes the names of the coauthors.
-
Just checked their surnames are included but only in the reference section. Nowhere else.
-
And yes the citation is not APA format but it's trying really hard to be, I think.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Discourteous at least, possibly dishonest too, did they even mention the other people exist as co-workers? Or do you just happen to know who was involved otherwise?
-
I happen to know.
-
And no they play it up as all their own work.
-
That's not good at all, it unfair on the others it's also fraudulent. Sadly they was science is managed these days will drive people to behave like this :(
-
It's really pathetic more than anything IMHO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You mean a post about work that is not published yet? I usually write a post to announce a new publication and then say that it is work from my coauthors and I but I don’t name them (but they show up in the screenshot of the paper).
-
No, a post about a published paper.
-
My reason for not placing the name of my coauthors is that they don't like having their name all over the internet.
-
I personally know everybody involved in this. They definitely would have loved to be mentioned.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you too? Guess we are both weird about that kind of thing. ;)
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is! Very rude.
-
Yes! Thank you.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

