Edit Brett Stephens, not the reference.
Bret Stephens’ latest column (https://nyti.ms/39kgVpU ), which argues that culture and history drive Jewish achievements, has been edited to remove a reference to a paper widely disputed as advancing a racist hypothesis. We’ve added the following editors’ note to the column.pic.twitter.com/Aj7eU3Fce2
-
-
-
Today, Jews were slaughtered because people vilify them for the very same ideas you put out there in this column. This is pathetic.
- 4 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
What if, and stick with me here for a second, Bret Stephens was never truly qualified to write for the Times; and not only does every piece he pens prove this, but they make the
@nytopinion editors look lazy, racist, or both purely by association? -
Maybe it's more than an appearance. Maybe they just are.
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
You do know you guys can edit for these things BEFORE publication, right?
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
“Whoops sorry! I should have edited this. Sincerely, the editor”
-
Those small-town local rags can’t afford editing staff.
- 3 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Do you guys not have editors or what? And isn't Bret being paid a lot of money to write these? Seems like doing race science is more than just a little oopsie.
-
You're correct, they haven't had editors for about 3 years now!
- 3 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.