So what? Every country has the right to make defensive or offensive weapons. Who gave US the right to make missiles? Who is selling missiles to Iran enemies like the Saudis?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
warmongering alert
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Missiles aren't nukes. Every nation has them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s one place Obama’s money has gone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good for them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder how many pallets of cash it would take to get them to stop?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cover Page THE NEW YORK TIMES, New York City - Late Edition Wednesday, May 23, 2018 | http://nytimes.com
@nytimespic.twitter.com/ad9g4020wI
-
The New York Times | http://nytimes.com
@nytimespic.twitter.com/JgtDXY3MLa
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also, this isn't something that started last week. It has been going on for years. Proof that the IND didn't do a thing but give Iran hundreds of millions of dollars.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
carrying water for
@realDonaldTrump and Israel...again. It's like you guys know you can get away with it because you paid no price for the last time. -
Are you suggesting that the piece isn't true, or that it shouldn't be reported even if true?
-
It depends on how it is phrased and structured. If the article tries to frame the discussion of Iran's development of traditional missile technology is framed in such a way as to portray them breaking the deal America broke, then yeah, they're not doing it right.
-
The article clearly states, "Such a program would not violate the international deal intended to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, or any other formal agreement," and also that the evidence predates the US departure from the deal. Read articles before you bash them.
-
dude, I DID read the article. Notice how the article is framed, and pay attention to the details. The article's click-bait title tells it all. Iran is acting nefarious! Look! in the desert! Secret! Advanced missile technology! The framing makes it far more nefarious than it is.
-
But that's all true: A secret desert installation that evidence suggests (but does not prove, as the article clearly states) the development of advanced long-range missile technology. That WOULD be nefarious.
-
It isn't. Every country develops long-range missile technology.
-
Not every country. And what makes it nefarious is the fact that Iran is not a democracy. If democratic nations want long-range missiles, that's perfectly fine. But non-democracies should be as weak as they can practically be kept.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks Trump.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.