President Trump's tweets pointed to this New York Times report that detailed how Robert Mueller is examining whether Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates offered help to the Trump campaign, and whether they coordinated with Russia in doing sohttps://nyti.ms/2KFv5F7
-
-
Show this thread
-
President Trump did not challenge the accuracy of our reporting, which you can read belowhttp://nyti.ms/2KFv5F7
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hey
@nytimes as journalists/editors does your responsibility consist mainly of printing accusations - no matter how absurd - like stenographers? Or do u have an obligation to include relevant factual info like the MULTIPLE PLEA DEALS & INDICTMENTS THAT HAVE ALREADY TAKEN PLACE? -
Like, "Despite MULTIPLE PLEA DEALS AND INDICTMENTS ALREADY ACHIEVED IN MUELLER PROBE, President Trump AGAIN raged about the special counsel investigation, charging that it had turned up no evidence of collusion with Russia and was now casting a worldwide net" YA KNOW, FOR CONTEXT
-
Otherwise, you're kinda just VALIDATING the FALSE accusations that are REFUTED BY COLD HARD NEWS-WORTHY EVENTS YOUR OWN PAPER HAS COVERED, which doesn't seem very objective or in the public interest. MAYBE I'M TOTALLY MISUNDERSTANDING YOUR WHOLE OBLIGATION-TO-INFORM THING
-
Hey, could you direct me to the public editor so I can ask about this? I'm assuming that's the best way to do this, instead of ranting on Twitter, right? Like a real dialog with the person responsible for managing reader concerns?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There have been numerous indictments. Mention those. There are more coming. Do your job.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you correct him NYT? Did you include the number of indictment, the guilty pleads in your articles come? Don’t bother us then
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That seems perfectly legitimate, as the reach of his corruption is global. From kazakistan to Russia to China the Saudi Arabia to the United Arab Emirates to Qatar to Scotland. Obviously throughout the United States. The sheer breadth of his criminality is almost unmatched.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The obstruction charges just keep on piling up against trump in his attempts to interfere with a lawful investigation by a lawful officer of the court all under the blind eyes of a unresponsive Congress .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump/Russia: 23 indictments - that smells badly of collusion
-
How many of those involved colluding with Russia?
-
Most and others to lie about meetings with the Russians. Why lie about meetings if they are innocent?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
NYT FAILED TO MENTION THE PROGRESS MUELLER HAS MADE ..WHY NOT ???pic.twitter.com/nMcWHPHfJI
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nobody knows what Mueller has found except Mueller. Trump is discovering, too late, that when you’re president, you have to follow the laws of the country. Can’t just make up your own rules.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should probably be mentioning in your headline that the investigation has produced 5 guilty pleas and almost two dozen indictments. Stop enabling his lies and obfuscation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why would Mueller, a Republican, be trying to hurt the GOP in the midterm elections.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.