There is nothing Supreme about a Court of millionaires deciding the fate of the poor people who they have no understanding of!
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The continued influence of for profit prisons. When humans are a commodity.
-
and just think, they wouldn't be there if they hadn't broken the law.. they wouldn't be in solitary if they hadn't tried to shank that guy that dissed their mother.
-
In civilised society, punishment is supposed to be about rehabilitation. Perhaps you'd be happier in Saudi Arabia?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can imagine that a lot of people don't care if people go crazy in prison. But put it this way: the great majority of prisoners will see the light of day again. It is in our best interests that they are rehabilitated, and their mental health is a large part of that process
-
This. This is exactly it. This is 100% exactly the point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the Geneva Convention (I believe) allows for prisoners of war to exercise outside why would we deny the same right to our citizens?
-
Oh no, you misunderstand. By that time anyone Trump doesn't like will no longer have citizenship... Or rights. The parallels are frightening. Doubters are urged to read up on 1920's& 30's Germany

-
I’m well aware of the parrels, I am also aware, when states (and therefore fellow citizens of the US) are willing going down that dangerous path. This nation has already slide back decades in 20 or so months.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Again? This man is a cancer.
-
I dunno, cancer can be cured nowadays. Or did u mean he looks like a big orange tumour? Actually I think you may be onto something !
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The utterly pointless SCOTUS wants to show it's fully behind the Dictator, lest it become surplus to requirements. This will become standard practice at all Trump's new Concentration Camps. Of course a fully partisan SCOTUS cannot perform the task it was set up to do. Why bother?
-
And WHY is the SCOTUS looking at this? They are not a scientific or psychiatric body. I imagine they'll be awarding Der Fuehrer the power of summary execution next. He'll need it for his version of the 'Night of the long knives'. Any Americans who aren't worried are idiots.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah thats just wrong I mean damn would they asking that question if they were prisoners
-
I dont want to say that we shouldn't let people exercise outside in prison, however I do think in high risk, or maximum security prisons, those individuals have ruined the lives of others, so why should we allow them.
-
Because we're human and not animals. I get it believe me I do. I personally know how it feels.
-
Would you be against it, if it were for life-ers, serial killers, and the like. Because that is who I would apply this too. Thoughts?
-
No I wouldn't. They can be secure enogh to move. What the point prison to you? Curious
-
To separate those ,who have committed acts against the law, from normal society in order for them to "pay" a "debt" that they owe for committing such acts.
-
Whoo did you look it up in the dictionary. Ok well see you yourself don't believe it's a torture house so why make it one.
-
Lol didnt look that up swear to God, just my own understanding of why we do it. And true, I myself have never experienced it so really I can't tell you much. I myself would never want such treatment, which is why I would also do agree with you. I would say curcumstantial cases.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.