Judging power and fairness by the numerical distribution of genitals is simply simpleminded.
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’m not a Fortune 500 executive either, am I oppressed?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Look I’m all for equal rights and opportunities for everyone. But we can’t hold statistics accountable to our sensitivities.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I wouldn’t want my daughter to get a position in a company simply on account of her sex
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Are you implying that someone doesn’t have the right to pass ownership of their company to anyone they want
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Gee, I don’t know. Maybe women chose different career paths than men?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Not they aren’t. My mother wasn’t “conditioned” to become a teacher. She tried to be an engineer and didn’t do great at it. Women, especially now, aren’t conditioned to be suited for certain career paths. They find what they want to do.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I thought the lobbyists were the Johns.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i am john
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
'We'll be as dramatic as possible to drum up readership and profits.' The best kind of dying breed.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Is it, though? Fixate on one industry, call it statistics. Arts degrees and whatnot.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
All I saw and remarked on was the inflammatory nature. There have been numerous studies attributed to both sides. You seem to have chosen yours, though.pic.twitter.com/Xu2YagdN4M
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.