So it's ok now to ignore laws because your conscience is higher than the law? Isn't that kinda like being a vigilante? Won't acts that one does under a vigilante defense still bring trouble with the law? Or is that only for us common folks? #QAnon
-
-
-
Yes, dear. It is. Think about those who followed orders (the law) and helped gather and gas Jews. The law is dangerous without conscience.
-
This is rich. The New York Times buried the fact that Jews were being exterminated in Europe. Now they're providing cover for some FBI guy who was trying to protect terrorists? Good grief.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I thought this story was about Jim Comey My bad
-
Comey hasn't leaked classified Intel.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
He leaked his UNCLASSIFIED memos. He did not leak classified intel.
-
4 out of 7 were classified and he leaked 4. One had to be classified. Basic math.pic.twitter.com/muOqDJBoGp
-
You used one of trumps most immature moments to emphasize your point. Had the opposite effect.
-
Isn't that the beauty of it??
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
WHY is
#RealityWinner still in jail, without bail for revealing the Russian interference in the election? -
Because she arbitrarily leaked top secret classified material
-
The English language is sensitive to word order. Because she's accused of leaking arbitrarily "top secret" classified material. There ya go. Strange thing is, others accused of more counts NEVER await their trials in jail.
-
Huh? She leaked TS/SCI arbitrarily, simple English
-
She's accused of leaking something arbitrarily TS/SCI which it was important for the public, or at the very least state election officials, to know. And by the way, that info is that the NSA promulgated claims of election tampering and they blamed Russia. No backing info.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So wait is this what is supposed to happen when a public officials shared classfied information? You get jail time? Wow, who would of thought!!!
-
There's a public interest exemption to the government's classification authority, as per New York Times Co. v. United States.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dude deserves a pardon.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.