@JustJenKing Did you see this? Sounds interesting!
-
-
-
All over it like a red hot rash Luke. It's the most amazing and wonderful thing! You should see the print edition - which I've only seen photos of but which looks magnificent. Can we get print editions of
@nytimes in Australia I wonder?@damiencave, do you know please?#obits -
I can ask my NY colleagues to send a few of the obits special print editions, but we don't have a system for print distribution in Australia unfortunately. Not yet!
-
Oh, that would be so great
@damiencave! Just because, well, you know, I am crazy for#obits (@DialOforObits is a project) and I DO have a NYT digital subscription...pic.twitter.com/n44MfwPixA -
I just sent NY an email to get a few copies sent this way. DM me your email or contact info and we'll find a way to get you a few copies - obit-lovers united!
-
It would be great to see some obits of our pioneering Australian women get an obit in the NYT!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Now if only
@nytimes would eliminate their 5/month article limit, we could actually read them#WomensHistoryMonth2018 -
I’m already at my limit.
Time for the subscription? -
During trying times like these
@nytimes and@washingtonpost should be free for all
-
Should’ve fully written bourgeoise ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Have been admiring the print edition of this all day.
#Overlooked@nytimespic.twitter.com/G78ipakEkO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
YOU'VE TWEETED THIS SOME 14 TIMES NOW.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By process of elimination, you won’t be highlighting black men? Why’s that? They will remain ‘overlooked’?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Women don't waste money on NY Times obituaries to glorify our legacy. Our families spend the money on charities of their choice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Read them and they are incredible. However, NYT leaders do owe readers a formal apology for their decades spent trivializing/marginalizing women. For such a prestigious paper, they should've had better foresight -- certainly many of your readers knew of this deficiency.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So you agree that the new York times has always been racist since its inception not just with this article digging out dead "white men"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why did you overlook these "remarkable woman?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Will you do an Obit on Margaret Sanger, founder progressive movement, Hillary hero, believer in eugenics and race purity through abortion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.