Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
nytimes's profile
The New York Times
The New York Times
The New York Times
Verified account
@nytimes

Tweets

The New York TimesVerified account

@nytimes

Where the conversation begins. Follow for breaking news, special reports, RTs of our journalists and more. Visit http://nyti.ms/2FVHq9v  to share news tips.

New York City
nytimes.com
Joined March 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The New York Times‏Verified account @nytimes Mar 9

    John Kelly thwarted a plan by the EPA chief Scott Pruitt, to hold military-style debates challenging climate change sciencehttp://nyti.ms/2IhLdw0 

    12:25 PM - 9 Mar 2018
    • 168 Retweets
    • 246 Likes
    • V O T E Claire Ashinze Mike Beeds yvonne van remmen Will Rath Michael Walsh Educational Tourist Dilawar Singh Gosal. MG DiStasio
    57 replies 168 retweets 246 likes
      1. Eddy Budard‏ @Timothy61830730 Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        Wow! Pruitt's arrogance, knows no bounds.

        0 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. AV8‏ @AV8intheblue Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        I can't imagine what happens to that Clown Show if McMaster and Kelly walk away here soon...

        2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
      3. Michele M.P.‏ @michele_pickens Mar 9
        Replying to @AV8intheblue @nytimes

        It's the plan according to Vanity Fair article. He wants a reset.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Josh Carullo‏ @joshuaacarullo Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        Whats a military style debate?

        2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
      3. StandUpResist! #BlueWave2018  🌊‏ @StandUpResist Mar 9
        Replying to @joshuaacarullo @nytimes

        „Do you agree with my position?“ (holds gun to his opponents head)

        0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. Susan Hatch‏ @SusaMorgan Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        What's a "military-style" debate? Doesn't the military call upon experts? Maybe Pruitt should have done it then. Surely the military doesn't use cherry-picked and distorted information deliberately.

        0 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Jim Garrison II‏ @JimGarrisonII Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        Were the debates to be held in Pruitt's Cone of Silence ?

        0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Julian Huguet *Blue Check Mark*‏ @jhug00 Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        I for one am all for it. You get your Fox News talking heads, we’ll get actual scientists, and we’ll shoot down every misconception you have in small and easy to understand terms.

        0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Doc Pickney‏ @DocPickney Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        Why would the left be scared to even debate the issue?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Jessica Woodland‏ @Jess_Woodland Mar 9
        Replying to @DocPickney @nytimes

        I dont think the issue is that. The science has already been peer reviewed. The agencies that want to disprove that man made polution affects climate change have a vested financial interest in fossil fuels or profit from the deregulation of industry.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. Doc Pickney‏ @DocPickney Mar 9
        Replying to @Jess_Woodland @nytimes

        The basis of the Scientific method is that NOTHING is a an absolute, that everything is a theory and that theories are Always to be contested and proved in the face of any or all evidence

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Jessica Woodland‏ @Jess_Woodland Mar 9
        Replying to @DocPickney @nytimes

        Do you think a political party that has demonstrated they are basically in the back pocket of the Koch Brothers with an EPA spearheaded by Pruitt would push these debates for the pure betterment of science?

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      6. Doc Pickney‏ @DocPickney Mar 9
        Replying to @Jess_Woodland @nytimes

        Doesn't matter. If Climate change can't hold up to questioning, then the theory needs to be re-worked. If it does, then it just moves on to the NEXT test. That's the ways science works. Nothing is EVER an absolute

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. Jessica Woodland‏ @Jess_Woodland Mar 9
        Replying to @DocPickney @nytimes

        The point is that it HAS been peer reviewed by climate scientists & the science does hold up. As a society we should be taking action and putting the energy and research funds into solutions. These exercises are delays & distractions by fossil fuel investors & lobbyists.

        2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      8. Doc Pickney‏ @DocPickney Mar 9
        Replying to @Jess_Woodland @nytimes

        The minute you move to accepting ANY theory as fact, you've moved from the realm of science to politics. I am just concerned with the continuance of Science for Science. To use ANY findings to shut down debate or ideas is wrong. If the science is right..it WILL hold up.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      9. End of conversation
      1. ARandomProducer‏ @ARPmusic_YT Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        They should actually have a debate though. I'd like to see how badly Pruitt loses. Religion would be banned from the debate, of course.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. HowardH‏ @HH41848213 Mar 10
        Replying to @nytimes

        Silly to debate climate change. Both sides are dug in and the scientific data is suspect at best. It is all computer model stuff. Garbage in, Garbage out! Follow the 💰!who is getting USG 💰for their science?😏

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Mike  🇨🇦 🇺🇸‏ @HappyAiredales Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        Mattis must save the planet. Hopefully he has a permit to carry a side arm at all times. In the event the world needs him to protect it.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Jennifer Howard‏ @liveluv707 Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        Thank you Kelly, I think

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Lawrence Miller‏ @lmiller9000 Mar 9
        Replying to @nytimes

        There is no legitimacy to the science of deniers. Pretending the issue is even debatable is a farce and gives this ludicrous fossil-fuel cabal a credence their arguments don’t merit.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info