Wow! Pruitt's arrogance, knows no bounds.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can't imagine what happens to that Clown Show if McMaster and Kelly walk away here soon...
-
It's the plan according to Vanity Fair article. He wants a reset.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whats a military style debate?
-
„Do you agree with my position?“ (holds gun to his opponents head)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What's a "military-style" debate? Doesn't the military call upon experts? Maybe Pruitt should have done it then. Surely the military doesn't use cherry-picked and distorted information deliberately.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Were the debates to be held in Pruitt's Cone of Silence ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I for one am all for it. You get your Fox News talking heads, we’ll get actual scientists, and we’ll shoot down every misconception you have in small and easy to understand terms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would the left be scared to even debate the issue?
-
I dont think the issue is that. The science has already been peer reviewed. The agencies that want to disprove that man made polution affects climate change have a vested financial interest in fossil fuels or profit from the deregulation of industry.
-
The basis of the Scientific method is that NOTHING is a an absolute, that everything is a theory and that theories are Always to be contested and proved in the face of any or all evidence
-
Do you think a political party that has demonstrated they are basically in the back pocket of the Koch Brothers with an EPA spearheaded by Pruitt would push these debates for the pure betterment of science?
-
Doesn't matter. If Climate change can't hold up to questioning, then the theory needs to be re-worked. If it does, then it just moves on to the NEXT test. That's the ways science works. Nothing is EVER an absolute
-
The point is that it HAS been peer reviewed by climate scientists & the science does hold up. As a society we should be taking action and putting the energy and research funds into solutions. These exercises are delays & distractions by fossil fuel investors & lobbyists.
-
The minute you move to accepting ANY theory as fact, you've moved from the realm of science to politics. I am just concerned with the continuance of Science for Science. To use ANY findings to shut down debate or ideas is wrong. If the science is right..it WILL hold up.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They should actually have a debate though. I'd like to see how badly Pruitt loses. Religion would be banned from the debate, of course.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Silly to debate climate change. Both sides are dug in and the scientific data is suspect at best. It is all computer model stuff. Garbage in, Garbage out! Follow the
!who is getting USG
for their science?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mattis must save the planet. Hopefully he has a permit to carry a side arm at all times. In the event the world needs him to protect it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you Kelly, I think
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is no legitimacy to the science of deniers. Pretending the issue is even debatable is a farce and gives this ludicrous fossil-fuel cabal a credence their arguments don’t merit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.