GUILTY. Let that sink in.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BobSMueller is bringing down the house
wonder if @realDonaldTrump will be added to the list. If yes, we deserve a public trial in a stadium so we can say 'lock him up' if he is found guilty of anything. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
All of this and still no Trump collusion with Russia. Meanwhile the
#SteeleDossier shows collusion with Russia by the Clinton campaign along with weaponization of government agencies by Obama. You can't ignore the elephant in the room anymore. -
The steele dossier isnt being used as the bible, its being used to corroborate info. And steeles dossier had very negative things to say about the russians. Why would russia want this? Your conspiracy makes no sense.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
-
And none of these pleas prove or even support the Dem’s phony “Trump-Russia” accusations. The real crimes, for which proof exists, are the Obama-Clinton-DNC-Russia conspiracy through the fraudulent Steele Dossier to interfere with and rig the US election for Crooked Hillary.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Not so much a hoax, fake news, or a witch hunt now is it,
@realDonaldTrump - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/967439246452764673 … grammar correction "have plead guilty".
-
Actually, no, but... (I only know this because when Trump tweeted “pled” some months ago and then his lawyer claimed to have written it. Lawyers know better.)http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/is_it_pleaded_or_pled …
-
Hundreds of thousands of defendants will be able to plead guilty to minor offences online under plans that have raised fears about secret justice. Example, if it's a group of people they plead guilty.
-
We are both wrong but, 5 plead guilty, would be correct there is no need for "have"
-
You are right. I misremembered.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Any crimes involving Russia or collusion? No. All crimes discovered were incidental to the investigation. Come back when you have proof.
-
What part of pleading guilty are you not comprehending? I realize auburn is in the south, but cmon man.
-
They are crimes yes. But the crimes discovered have no actual relation to Russia or collusion with Russian government to “fix” the election.
-
Papadopoulos: "I'm going to contact the Russians to get Hillary's emails." Campaign: Cool, do it. FBI: Did you say this? Papadopoulos: No. FBI: No? Papadopoulos: Okay, yes. Savell: NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIANS!!!
-
how is what you said a criminal act? how can you prosecute this under a court of law? Under what charges? What kind of shitty, xenophobic precendent would this create? This whole narrstive is collectively stupid, people need to read beyond headlines and think critically
-
There are a couple of ways this is criminal. If you're interested, I'll bother to explain.
-
ok. But how is it criminal in relation to the initial assertion that trump colluded w/ the russians? What relevant statutes would apply? (please don’t say treason or logan act) With the evidence so far, this would get dismissed quicky by neutral judges.
-
First: The most obvious (but which Mueller seems to be skirting, more below) is violations of the Campaign Finance Reform Act, which outlaws anything of value being contributed to a campaign by a foreign agent.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.