If your going to represent a time period at least get it right. Yes there were queens but the king was #1 most of that time. PC culture is terrible when you hide what actually took place.
-
-
-
*you're
-
*i can’t argue against your valid point so I’m going to correct your spelling instead
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Lmao you’re the only one who seems upset
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is great! I will always remember going as a teenager, telling the Medieval Times host that I was vegan and then my entire family being jealous of how amazing my meal was
Medieval Times doesn't disappoint.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not have queens and kings? Alternate between shows
-
Why not have them Battle it off in a series of ridiculous challenges?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why does it have to be one or another. Can’t we just have both?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Amazing investigative journalism
@nytimes. Truly groundbreaking stuff.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And this decision had nothing to do with Game of Thrones.
-
I was thinking Wonder Woman
-
She needed a hero, so she became one. Lovely that. Cheers!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@MedievalTimes I don't get it. It's the craziest revisionist fantasy, yet. How is it progress to kill off boys and men?! -
Considering that there actually WERE queens during the Middle Ages (in their own right, not just queen consorts...hello, Eleanor of Aquitaine)...revisionist history? Not so much.
-
not the headline…"does away with ALL kings to replace them with JUST queens" (para)—that doesn't happen.
-
Lots of things “don’t happen”; doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t or can’t. Also, you do realize that it’s a theatrical fantasy/medieval Disney on Ice but with horses and no ice and not a documentary, right? Right.
-
An alarming fictitious fantasy eliminating men. Escapism solves nothing while passing as entertainment.
-
Plenty of men still there: See the Knights for further.
-
not the point. This promotes eliminating men as leaders, instead of problem-solving. It's delusional.
-
That’s a perfectly misanthropic way to see it...as opposed to including and acknowledging that leaders aren’t ONLY men. Good job. Stay with that.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.