In an email to The New York Times, Dylan Farrow replied to statements made by Letty Aronson, Woody Allen’s sister and longtime producer http://nyti.ms/2BycKVz pic.twitter.com/oTaicjagds
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
In an email to The New York Times, Dylan Farrow replied to statements made by Letty Aronson, Woody Allen’s sister and longtime producer http://nyti.ms/2BycKVz pic.twitter.com/oTaicjagds
OR! Dylan has told the truth for 20 years. Repeatedly. And nobody listened. Because he made ~films~. Also? the guy groomed and slept with his daughter, whom he raised from the AGE OF NINE.
The "allegation" was that on Aug. 4 1992 was that Allen placed his head in Dylan's lap and touched her "private parts". No intercourse, no other sexual acts. Read this:https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-the-shocking-custody-case-court-documents-that-shed-light-on-the-dylan-farrow-woody-allen-saga …
If it is true Woody Allen is no exception from other sexual abuse offenders. I always thought why he married his stepdaughter and their relationship before she became his wife. (One sauce said she was posing nude by Allen’s request?)
She is not his step daughter.
Nitpicking over details is cowardly. He was a stepfather figure since she was a little girl on through her teens, when he began to be attracted to and photographed her. It's not normal and is, in fact, deviant.
Though she, herself, claims this is simply not true. She has also spoken out about the fact that Mia Farrow painted a picture of her as a learning-disabled child, when in fact she has a masters degree now.
I have boycotted all of Woody Allen's works since he first married his daughter. Apologists, legalists and hair-splitters on that issue need not apply; what he did was wrong.
He's 82. His career should have been put in peril when it would have made a real difference.
THIS
Don't let him work with young women, girls then it's probably ok.
You think excluding women is the answer?
Excluding them from working a sexual predator. Is that a problem?
There are women just as talented as Woody Allen. They would be easier to find if financiers could see or hear women over 40, sexual harassment wasn’t ubiquitous & there hadn’t been 5,000 years of misogyny. People think female led projects are riskier. They are wrong. Objectively.
Financing Woody Allen’s films should be a financial & social risk.
Financing any movie is a financial and social risk, what's your point?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.