Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
nytimes's profile
The New York Times
The New York Times
The New York Times
Verified account
@nytimes

Tweets

The New York TimesVerified account

@nytimes

Where the conversation begins. Follow for breaking news, special reports, RTs of our journalists and more. Visit http://nyti.ms/2FVHq9v  to share news tips.

New York City
nytimes.com
Joined March 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The New York Times‏Verified account @nytimes Jan 26

    The BBC is reducing the salaries of some of its male journalists after criticism over unequal payhttp://nyti.ms/2GlBqUv 

    9:27 AM - 26 Jan 2018
    • 417 Retweets
    • 934 Likes
    • neha soni Peoplescape Search John Klein ONG ODESCA Daniel Pascal@28 carla king Mike Kuffar 🇺🇸 🇮🇪 🇭🇺 🇪🇸 🇬🇧 🇳🇴 ReecyRose @haerdetunji
    333 replies 417 retweets 934 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. TOᑭ ᖇOᑭE TᖇAViS‏ @TopRopeTravis Jan 26
        Replying to @nytimes

        Are you effing serious?! INCREASE THE FEMALE'S SALARIES INSTEAD! Jesus.

        9 replies 11 retweets 284 likes
      3. gnartS‏ @jaspernavy Jan 26
        Replying to @TopRopeTravis @nytimes

        This was a budgetary solution. Instead of lowering everyone's salaries, they lowered the male ones by a higher percentage. While a backward way of going about addressing a wage gap, it was their most equitable solution without cutting personnel.

        4 replies 2 retweets 41 likes
      4. Mary Veldhouse‏ @maryjveld Jan 26
        Replying to @jaspernavy @TopRopeTravis @nytimes

        That is still idiotic.

        2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes
      5. gnartS‏ @jaspernavy Jan 26
        Replying to @maryjveld @TopRopeTravis @nytimes

        It’s not that idiotic. BBC had to cut payroll, so they decided to take it from their male employees only. Better than an across the board cut which would disproportionately hurt women.

        5 replies 1 retweet 11 likes
      6. Mary Veldhouse‏ @maryjveld Jan 26
        Replying to @jaspernavy @TopRopeTravis @nytimes

        Yeah ok. That is a real morale booster in the workplace I’m sure. Not!

        1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
      7. gnartS‏ @jaspernavy Jan 26
        Replying to @maryjveld @TopRopeTravis @nytimes

        Doing the right thing doesn’t always mean everyone gets a pony.

        2 replies 1 retweet 21 likes
      8. Mary Veldhouse‏ @maryjveld Jan 26
        Replying to @jaspernavy @TopRopeTravis @nytimes

        I believe that it is not the right thing. There was a need to cut the payroll, and in that process they made it political. That’s not good business.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      9. Clay Shirky‏Verified account @cshirky Jan 26
        Replying to @maryjveld @jaspernavy and

        They made it political when they decided to pay the men more.

        1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes
      10. 2 more replies
      1. New conversation
      2. Razor‏ @hale_razor Jan 26
        Replying to @nytimes

        Because remedying underpaying one gender by underpaying the other makes everything ok. Also, seems there are again only two genders.

        7 replies 22 retweets 105 likes
      3. Federalist Musket 🇺🇸‏ @Patriot_Musket Jan 26
        Replying to @hale_razor @nytimes

        I can't keep up anymore.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. gooseycheeks‏ @gooseycheeks Jan 26
        Replying to @Patriot_Musket @hale_razor @nytimes

        The Left would prefer the poor be more poor so long as the rich were less rich.

        0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
      5. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Tutku Ozkan‏ @tutkukanci Jan 26
        Replying to @nytimes

        The length they go not too increase women’s salaries

        1 reply 2 retweets 65 likes
      3. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. Ted Trembley‏ @Ted_Trembley Jan 26
        Replying to @nytimes

        Suzy: “Mommy, Billy has 7 chocolate bars and I only have 5.” Mommy: “Okay Suzy, do you want one more chocolate bar?” Suzy: “NO! I want us to have the same number of chocolate bars!” Mommy: “Fine, Billy - give me two of your chocolate bars. Are you happy, Suzy?” Suzy: “Yes.”pic.twitter.com/n8ZK4jDetg

        2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes
      3. kathy fights back‏ @Cool4kat Jan 26
        Replying to @Ted_Trembley @nytimes

        That’s what Suzy wanted. Instead it was Suzy: Billy has 7 chocolate bars and I only have 2 Mom: ok I will eat 4 of Billy’s and tell him it is all your fault. And by the way billy is your boss. Good luck with your work environment (sorry for losing the Metaphor)

        0 replies 0 retweets 28 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Matthew Whiz Buckley‏ @WhizCheck6 Jan 26
        Replying to @nytimes

        yeah... time to stop paying people based on merit! pay on GENDER! wait...what?? aren't there 26 genders now?!

        7 replies 0 retweets 39 likes
      3. Matthew Prorok‏ @MJtheProphet Jan 26
        Replying to @WhizCheck6 @nytimes

        Men getting paid more rather than paying people based on merit is literally the problem.

        1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
      4. Matthew Prorok‏ @MJtheProphet Jan 26
        Replying to @MJtheProphet @WhizCheck6 @nytimes

        On further reflection, this was a bit unfair. It's not the entire problem. You assuming that the men's salaries were higher because they deserved it, and that women would be expected to make less on a merit-based system, is also the problem.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      5. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. DocKAC‏ @DocKAC Jan 26
        Replying to @nytimes

        How about firing the people at the top that allowed this to go on for so long and use the money to upgrade the women to fair pay?!

        1 reply 3 retweets 31 likes
      3. 1 more reply

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info