I haven't read the book, but I am aware that there is no love lost between Wolff and the NY Times. A review from a neutral observer would be more convincing.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"A 'possibly' dysfunctional President"? That clown has more issues than Vogue. He is a dysfunction sandwich (on white, of course), with extra hate, lies and corruption. He is a mess.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Highly entertaining, even though what it recounts is horrifying. It reads like a sitcom, but is in fact, more like a horror film
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why does the Times spend so much time and energy attacking this book and the portrait of the president?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
New conversation
-
-
Pandering to the DOTARD
@realDonaldTrump is not a good look for you NYT!! So glad I didn’t pay to read your paper!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
POSSIBLY? You need look no further than his tweets to see what a dysfunctional human being he is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Excellent book - I'm already on Chapter 16. It's entertaining and horrifying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you didn't know this guy was dysfunctional when he rode down the escalator to announce his candidacy then you're not very observant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This review does Wolff no harm at all as it criticises in areas that are hardly significant. Why would there be firm conclusions if the story is still developing? Why should reports from diverse sources dovetail? Does a mis spelling really invalidate anything, it’s not a novel.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ethics isn't black and white supremacists in the white paper.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Truth or fabrication, Trump is still winning.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
All lies!
-
Really? How did you come to that conclusion? Two possible answers: 1- You were at the WH the entire time and know it’s all lies 2- you’re the liar and have no way of backing it up. I’m going to say it’s the latter
-
Really, anyone with an IQ above 30 could identify considerable inconsistencies in the book - and note that some conclusions/observations were fabricated/embellished significantly - guess you are at 25 hey ?
-
Again! I will repeat myself that neither one of you were there to witness anything. You’re just expressing your feelings and opinions that I particularly don’t care for. Your IQ is your problem and you getting old is also your problem.
-
The writer came out and said he never interviewed the president. It’s all hearsay. So my opinion stands, Total fiction! All lies!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.