Sure, Jerry Richardson was an unapologetic racist and sexual predator, but he was polite, always picked up after himself and was very, very economically anxious
-
-
-
Sexual predation isn't very polite
-
I’m mocking
@nytimes coverage of Nazis and sexual predators. In this story they claim that accusations run counter to his “generosity.”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Another ridiculous assertion by the
#NYTimes. Richardson is selling a business he owns; harassment charges are irrelevant to the franchise’s value. He’s not profiting from abuse but rather from his investment.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This isn't a responsible headline. In truth, he is cashing in on his investment after allegations of abuse were made public. The abuse accusations did not increase his wealth.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
He was going to sell with or without this coming out. You don't lose your business in this country just because you made people feel uncomfortable. This headline is a bit of a reach
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's about to sell something he owns. What am I missing here? People accused of harassment should be prohibited from selling their property?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Generally, being convicted of something (which he hasn’t) doesn’t even result in the forfeiture of your personal property. Is that what people want?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The same as Donald Sterling in the NBA.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
andClinton gets blown in the Oval Office and gets $800K to spew his drival.. and that OK with everyone..
#hipocrates - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Legitimate question though... What's the alternative?
-
Right? He's the OWNER. Meaning the options are to let him maintain the power that he used to be a dirty, racist bastard and continue profiting off it OR let him sell it, walk away with a lump sum, but clean your hands of him
-
The article suggests he should have to give the money to victims. I default to believing women who make accusations but that's a dangerous precedent that your livelihood can be taken away because of an accusation. Best option is to sell and walk away.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Richardson was wealthy before deciding to sell the Panthers, so the headline is nonsense. What's a dirty old man going to do with all that money anyway, I'm sure he gladly give a large chunk of it away if he could only recapture his reputation & save those women their heartache.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Alleged abuse”. Whoops, forgot this is NYT where truth is minor consideration in stories
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Think he gives a shit? He made his money and about to make more. Rich stay that way
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.