Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
nytimes's profile
The New York Times
The New York Times
The New York Times
Verified account
@nytimes

Tweets

The New York TimesVerified account

@nytimes

Where the conversation begins. Follow for breaking news, special reports, RTs of our journalists and more. Visit http://nyti.ms/2FVHq9v  to share news tips.

New York City
nytimes.com
Joined March 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The New York Times‏Verified account @nytimes 6 Dec 2017

    "I'm Harvey Weinstein — you know what I can do"http://nyti.ms/2BE998A 

    2:31 AM - 6 Dec 2017
    • 80 Retweets
    • 163 Likes
    • hark bohara Zacharia Masanja13 Ujjal Magar i am oak Diana Tanya L. Domi Wednesday María Maturana Yalalu
    95 replies 80 retweets 163 likes
      1. Mimi and Me‏ @LoveBoo_Mimi 6 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        This is why I'm a NYT subscriber. It appears that you and the brave, brave women who told their stories were the only people with the guts to bring that monster down. Bravo!

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. and you feel shame‏ @ShootItGonchar 6 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        They used to try to get people to confess to stuff like heresy and witchcraft by putting heavier and heavier stones on them. They should do that to Weinstein, but just on his balls. Confession optional.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. NO Right Wingnuts‏ @WingnutRight 6 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        Harvey's like Roy Moore abusing their power over women in weaker, younger or beholden positions. Al @SenFranken Franken is entirely different in that he was in no such position of power. His accusers are opportunistic political weapons deployed by Bannon and his cronies.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Siddiq Bashar‏ @siddiqbashar 6 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        pic.twitter.com/AGlYzq9XRN

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      3. Siddiq Bashar‏ @siddiqbashar 6 Dec 2017
        Replying to @siddiqbashar @nytimes

        pic.twitter.com/aP9nORayXB

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Siddiq Bashar‏ @siddiqbashar 6 Dec 2017
        Replying to @siddiqbashar @nytimes

        pic.twitter.com/hpCyt0oOfG

        3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. 1 more reply
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        the final words in the 2011 article are apparently "poor guy’s movie".) (61/61) (cc: @jodikantor, @jimrutenberg, @mega2e, @susandominus, @SteveEder, @RonanFarrow, @NewYorker, @AGSchneiderman, @AGBecerra)

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        appears to contain a publication error, in which a large portion of the article is repeated after the article should end; {60/n}

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        behavior in detail, so that readers can get a clearer picture of Weinstein's personality and character (and of the allegations of sexual violence and sexual harassment Weinstein currently faces). (Note: the 2011 @VanityFair article discussed in this series of tweets {59/n}

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        accounts of Weinstein's violent sexual attacks. In this regard, rather than minimizing and neglecting to discuss the violent and abusive behavior Weinstein apparently displayed during his day-to-day management of Miramax, perhaps the @nytimes should instead discuss such (58/n)

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        in them: {1} 6-Oct-2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/06/business/media/harvey-weinsteins-media-enablers.html …; {2} 11-Oct-2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/11/business/harvey-weinstein-sexual-harassment.html …; {3} 11-Oct-2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/11/business/weinstein-company.html …; {4} 23-Oct-2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/23/us/harvey-weinstein-eric-schneiderman.html …). Since the @nytimes's 5-Oct-2017 story broke, quite a few females have come forward with disturbing (57/n)

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        its aforementioned 2017 articles (especially the 5-Oct-2017 and 5-Dec-2017 articles). (Note: the descriptions in Biskind's book are also relevant to the following four recent @nytimes articles/editorials regarding Weinstein, but are not discussed or mentioned {56/n}

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        Miramax employees or ex-employees) that are contained therein (and discussed in this series of tweets). It is thus unclear why @nytimes did not discuss (or even mention in passing) the descriptions of Weinstein's workplace behavior that appear in Biskind's book in any of (55/n)

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        Harvey Weinstein's workplace behavior. Nonetheless, the 2004 book review DOES indicate that @nytimes WAS AWARE of Biskind's portrayal of Weinstein in 'Down and Dirty Pictures', as well as the disturbing first-person accounts of Harvey and Bob Weinstein (provided by {54/n}

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        does indicate that Biskind portrays Weinstein as "an egomaniacal bully" with "a temper the size of TriBeCa", who "humiliates employees" and "overturns loaded breakfast tables"; of course, the point of the book review was not to dwell on or discuss the implications of (53/n)

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        Biskind's book 'Down and Dirty Pictures' WAS REVIEWED by the @nytimes in 2004 (review accessible here: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/14/books/books-of-the-times-the-cowboys-who-took-on-the-indies.html …). The @nytimes's 2004 book review is written in a light-hearted tone, and seems to largely gloss over Weinstein's violent behavior, although it (52/n)

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        2004 (the same year that Biskind's book was published), which is well before the @nytimes's 2017 articles came out. (Note: the following 2017 @VanityFair article also indicates that the 2011 article was originally published in 2004: https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/10/peter-biskind-harvey-weinstein-allegations …). Furthermore, {51/n}

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. S. Bhattacharyya‏ @SBhattacharyya2 28 Dec 2017
        Replying to @nytimes

        article, the (@VanityFair) article can easily be found through web searches. The @VanityFair article is currently dated in 2011, although the URL (i.e., web address) for the article (and text in the introduction of the article) suggests that it was originally published in (50/n)

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info