Hey there. I have an idea. How about you do interviews with the victims of nazis instead? Maybe one of the survivors of the terroristic vehicle attack that took Heather Heyer's life? Just a thought.
-
-
-
Maybe do a featuring about how this ideology is shared by the likes of Anders Breviek, or many other mass shooters like those responsible for the Wisconsin Sikh temple and Quebec Mosque shootings? Place Nazism in the proper context of international terrorism?pic.twitter.com/3p4100PaqB
-
How about speaking to the husband of Jo Cox, the UK politician murdered by a nazi? Or the survivor of the Portland knife attack?https://twitter.com/CaseyExplosion/status/931519503732703233 …
-
How about, any time you have an urge to write a sympathetic piece about a Nazi, you go and write two pieces about their victims instead? I've no more interest in the daily life of a Nazi than I have in that of an ISIS supporter
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
My family died in camps, so let me weigh in on this: You don't "shed light" on nazis by talking to them. You do that by paying tribute to their victims, by breaking down and condemning their ideology. You haven't done that yet. This isn't journalism. It's sensationalism.
-
This is shameful clickbait bullshit. I hope people retract their subscriptions until you dedicate time to the victims and drop any piece focused on their oppressors. Giving any person the spotlight only makes others want to join them. This is pathetic and dangerous behaviour.
-
So, learn from your mistakes and stop this bullshit. Some of us lost entire sections of our history to people like this. This type of article and the pathetic excuse that followed is an insult to the millions who suffered.
-
It would be far less insulting to spit on the Holocaust memorial than to do what you've done with these articles. Until a full apology is issued, my family and I will retract our subscriptions and I hope other victims do the same.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
'Significant' criticism? That's one word for it. Next time, maybe instead of normalizing nazis, try for the kind of thought, analysis and responsibility depicted here by
@magi_jay, for instance:https://twitter.com/magi_jay/status/934875769850998790 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is how you reported Michael Brown's murder, so please spare us. I'm glad I had the sense to cancel my subscription to the
#NewYorkTimespic.twitter.com/HzjPPHNHpk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too little, too late.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Blah, blah, blah. We're the New York Times. We're not wrong, you are. Blah, blah, blah."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wow, what a self-serving, hollow concession. “Award Winning Blogger Agreed With Us!”. If there is equity in word count you just squandered a fortune. A double down of stupidity. What a waste of a podium in this critical time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who made the "editorial decision" to use the phrase "Nazi sympathizer" instead of simply "Nazi"? The fewer words, the better, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You blatantly said you're sorry we took it the way we did, not sorry that you said it. That's like me robbing someone & then telling them "Well, I'm sorry you feel that my possessing your stereo is wrong, I won't do it again!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.