"Speak for yourselves." - Massachusetts
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because the current government received loads of money from the NRA..........
-
And before that, the previous government too, that’s why we are in this stage , still after all this time
-
Organizations such as the NRA or tabacco corporations (for example), you know things like that have no place in financing political parties.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of course it would... Did we seriously expect things to change?
-
every administration reacts to the issues as they arise and table them as they fade. This is wrong.
@DNC@IndivisibleTeam@OurRevolution .. -
Until next time....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because it doesn’t matter. You can bump fire an AR-15 with your belt loop. The problem is the AR-15.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why the push to ban bump stocks has slowed down? Because there hasn't been a mass murder in the last 12 hours with an automatic weapon.
-
Semi automatic-loophole speech
-
Speech needs to be performed by the semi-automatic dementia looper in chief.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s all good! All we need is prayers for the victims. We also need to avoid politicizing the issue and respect the families as they mourn and then forget about it as usual
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What needs to be banned are the weapons the stocks are supposed to "modify".
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Massachusetts banned bump stocks this week. Just do it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is because people appear to have a constitutional right that greatly increases the ability of take lives of others. That right appears to be more important than. Their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. This is so sad.pic.twitter.com/8x99AQS7PG
-
Constitution protects you from the government, not from other civilians. Stripping others of their rights because you can't sack up and defend yourself is not excusable. It's a non negotiable right. Until you can fight all of us, you'll never take anything away
-
Wow I thought law's and the purpose of Government was the health, Safety and Welfare of the people. I suppose you don't believe in the need for police or the Military as you should defend yourself. But then you will not support overreaching to homicide.pic.twitter.com/NGumC0QOzF
-
Actually I'm in the military. That's considered external protection and it's an enumerated clause set forth from the very beginning. Cops are good for cleaning up the mess and they are always 10 minutes too late. and that car homicide stuff.. it's a joke.
-
I have served since 1979 medically distcharged 2359 10Nov17. I reckon the Second Amendment was designed and envisioned to reduce the need for speed standing military. If the people who are armed had to do the implicit duties this would make sense. Everyone with guns doesn'tpic.twitter.com/xHvzxs90ha
-
This is another reason I don't buy into gun control. It's just a symptom, not the cure. Almost every country that has enacted gun control received spikes in murders. If we are talking about the importance of lives, then shootings count for nothing.pic.twitter.com/kmsbS9QDtE
-
You want to give the government more power. I don't think you actually understand the fundamentals of your own argument
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.