Oh hey, Freedom of Speech?
-
-
-
State-supported Russian media. They deserve much worse. Whose side are YOU on, comrade?
-
Because US media don't have agenda driven huge money behind their ads?
-
They fact check. They verify. Nice try, fascist. Keep reading "news" from InfoWars and Breitbart, like the rest of the sheep.



-
CorpMedia parrot WHouse, WStreet, entertainment & r not journalists. They deserve censorship as much as RT
-
which neither do...and the irony is that dissenting voices are necessary for democracy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
US became a banana republic. What a shame.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Misses point entirely. Bans two KNOWN state media sources and IGNORES TROLL FARMS. Isn't the point to remove DECEPTIVE sources? Odd...
-
Yeah, I feel about RT, Sputnik, BBC, PBS, Voice of America, al Jazeera, shall I go on? I feel the same about all of these groups.
-
Let’s try some facts. Putin backs RT, Sputnik & worked to influence our election. THAT is NOT acceptable. Banning them is the right choice.
-
Ban Al Jazeera? Ban BBC who has been caught spreading British propaganda to make American adore the monarchs they revolted against in birth!
-
You see, throwing stones is never wise. Yes, these nations use funding apparatuses to push national objectives in media. US invented it.
-
Remember Radio Free Europe & "Color Revolutions?" Were we not meddling then? What about known CIA agents fomenting the "Arab Spring?" Then?
-
What about killing Saddam Hussein & leading a genocidal rampage that has resulted in at least 6 million direct deaths & likely many more.
-
U flipped topic.Any nation in wh we meddled could choose not to allow our news.But Putin ‘weaponized’ fake news & social media to chg elctn.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow so Americans have so little faith in freedom of speech and democracy that they rely on censorship ? Land if the free my ass
-
The whole place is a hotbed of censorship!! Totally disgusting!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At "worst" RT is counter-propaganda, and the textbook definition of counter-propaganda requires that it be based in fact (otherwise it is ineffective, besides). If RT was broadcasting falsehoods the solution is a lawsuit for libel, slander, etc.
#freeRT#counterpropaganda -
Did
@nytimes reported about this court case in Malaysia? Ever?pic.twitter.com/TInOmBqUcE
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.