The judge’s ruling was only temporary, and prevents the law from taking effect on Friday while a suit goes forwardhttp://nyti.ms/2eGE9f4
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a world. A liberal judge somewhere can just make up a law
-
It's clear that trump believes he and his cronies are above the law as evidence by the pardon of crimes. So let's not talk about "law&order"
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Meanwhile ANTIFA brutally attacks people for no reason, and BLM "activists" are looting Houston during the floods
#liberalhypocrisy -
Tweet unavailable
-
ANTIFA attack Trump supporter for - ready? - supporting Trump. Cowards in masks/armor burn flags & riot. ANTIFA = domestic terrorists.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Cool, you're saying if I disagree with someone I can violently attack them! Great logic.pic.twitter.com/QsuJjVWNIj
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nice reminder that Gov Abbott is a monster.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The dems, once again, making enforcement of federal law illegal
-
This is a judge questioning the constitutionality of a bill. If "enforcement" of a law violated constitutional rights it must be stopped.
-
This ruling does not have to do with the issue of sanctuary cities itself but the contents of a bill designed to crack down on them.
-
Whether you support sanctuary cities or not (I very much do support them) the contents of the bill are scary.
-
By the sound of it it could lead to racial profiling and withholding of due process.
-
This judge is absolutely doing his job to halt this bill from taking effect. It has nothing to do with "Dems".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good luck with that decision holding up the Supreme Court.
-
The Constitution backs this ruling 100%
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.