Having a nephew with hemophilia, this could be a godsend. The last line of the article is very significant! #GodILoveScience
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why the fear mongering? Science has ethics. This has such great potential. So why focus on a nonexistent, unlikely outcome?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd love to read one article about a breakthrough that doesn't include fear mongering about (valid) concerns but focuses on success
-
Not saying ignore concerns. Just saying it's always concerns. More than success or positive future impact it's fear mongering.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Aside from obvious ethical concerns, other questions arise from whether or not these edits are safe from harmful mutations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1st, this is an astonishing breakthrough in a Republican age of climate denial & creationism. 2nd, this is where regulations do public good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no no no. what next? choosing the perfect template baby? Horrifyingly morally and ethically wrong. nature provides a necessary service.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
sorry, but it is exactly about that. its genetic modification. simple. and wrong.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
so every disease is cured... then what? We all starve. Genius. Nature is the ultimate apex predator for a reason.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Ignoring the reality of over population is unbelievably naive. Google check and see the true cost to all of ushttp://www.independent.co.uk/environment/overpopulation-is-main-threat-to-planet-521925.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Heat ray vision babies are the future
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.