Fuck. You.
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sickening rewriting of history here. Didn't your paper do enough with the pivotal role it played in "stovepiping" Bush lies for war?
-
Yes, hasn't MSM done enough damage? Truthful, investigative reporting has been replaced w/ corporate propaganda. Propping up the Oligarchy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
iran rules iraq? what a terrible characterization of an alliance
-
if only they didnt get along, that would be great! because that's all that region needs, more distrust of neighbors
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Uncle Sam invaded Iraq in the name of WMD,knowing full well there was none. Paid a price,yet didn't achieve objective. Hope lessons learnt !pic.twitter.com/zeqnyoyaEP
-
"Hope lessons learnt"







- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
the invasion was an excuse to pay out federal funds to military contracting companies in which your political leaders are heavily invested.
-
anyone who believes anything else about America's goals is on some Agnes of God levels of denial and should probably not be paid to write.
-
like, how fucking DARE you attempt to parse disaster capitalism into yet another war on yet another country for yet another decade.
-
if you & your propaganda mill hadn't already enthusiastically endorsed Obama permitting the banks to essentially privatise the fed reserve..
-
..I would suggest that your nation owes back every penny it permitted companies like Halliburton and Academi/Xe/Blackwater to extort.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is an absolutely hideous rewriting of history. That's not even the lying excuse the Bush gang made when they invaded. (Rem WMD?)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Amazing how recurrent this trope is: US intentions noble if naive; foes' goals always evil and cynical.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The US shouldn't have destabilized the region with its immoral, illegal invasion of Iraq that the NEW YORK TIMES supported
-
So did Congress. But they were LIED to.
-
There was ample evidence that there were no WMDs.
-
935 false statements in run-up to invasion: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
