-
-
-
It a partial victory because the ban was only PARTIALLY reinstated.
-
can refugees that don’t work or go to school in US be allowed entry? Nope! That was the whole point. it effects majority not min. u lost.
-
They ruled on whether the ban would be in effect until they could hear the case after the summer. Read the article dude.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Supreme Court; "Unanimous Decision to Conduct Your 90 Day Ban for At Least 120 Days"
@nytimes "Partial Victory" -
Only part of the ban was reinstated.
-
Yeah, the part banning ppl with no ties to the US and no legitimate reason to be here immigrating from countries rife w renegade Jihadists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
9-0

not one judge agrees with the 9th Circuit . -
6-3. Read it
-
9-0, there were three dissents who wanted the entire travel ban reinstated. It's a GREAT day.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The 90 days have expired and the only terrorist attacks on US soil have been made by White Nationalists. Let's address THAT issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why does he still need it? He wanted 90 days to vet refugees, and he's had 150. The lower court orders did not prevent him from vetting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LOL "partial" Let's be honest it's a huge W
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The travel ban that should have already expired. Ridiculous
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Will geta full victory once SCOTUS hears case & liberal politica lower court judges will be exposed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.