Supreme Court has no districts, they are not elected...the terms can't even apply to each other.
The Supreme Court will consider whether partisan gerrymandering can violate the Constitutionhttp://nyti.ms/2sOT5jz
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Anyone who has seen a congressional district map knows the answer to that. The actual question is how partisan are the Justices themselves.
-
I don't think you want to know that answer
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This may be the most important SCOTUS case of our generation. Huuuuge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course it does, but our politicians have been doing this for decades to protect their own turf.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The very fact these people were allowed to do this in the first place should be a violation of their oath of office & they should be gone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how is the answer to that not "of course it does"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah, gerrymandering, the best thing that ever happened to the GOP. Explains the unexplainable!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ummm it takes the Supreme Court to say that rigged elections are violating the constitution?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.