Scorching? .014 degrees rise in temperature in the next 100 years? Seriously.
-
-
-
Huh. So you don't believe the science, but you believe the science data that suits your purpose. Very versatile in your denial. Cheers!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The United States has the greatest moral obligation to solve the problem. Countries harmed by climate change will not forget the US failure.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The U.S. has contributed more than any other country to the atmospheric CO2 that is promoting increased vegetation growth. Simple chemistry.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Increased oxygen production cools the air and promotes condensation and precipitation.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Warming oceans cause increased evaporation that produce clouds and shield the surface from solar heat. Then condensation causes rain.
-
Rain cools down even more and waters the vegetation which produces oxygen that causes additional cooling. Hot air elevates and causes...
-
a vacuum at see level which is filled with cooler air from north and south. That is the water and wind atmospheric cycles. Elemental.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Americans Cons love to freeload and not pay for their actions. They want to push the costs onto others since they are deadbeats.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
USA messed up our climate, the bill is for the rest of the world? Disruption is power, according to Bannonpic.twitter.com/HD0hfvFxTo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sick.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#ParisClimateDeal may be our final hope to stop#climatechange. We need to#universalizeresistance today if humanity is to surviveThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Although, we're on a downward trend. Look at China.
-
Ssssssh - that destroys the US is Evil narrative - note also the chart is two years old
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You guys should listen to New York Times' own Bret Stephens about how maybe it isn't happening?
-
I'm going with the data.
-
I dunno, if
@nytimes is paying Stephens all that money for his words, maybe we should value a data deniers opinion just as much as the data?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.