I agree. She has the right to her speech. We have the right to ours mocking her outrage and disgust that people don't like her. #Karma
-
-
-
What's your take on violent protest suppressing her speech? Genuinely curious.
-
I have no problem with peaceful protest. I have a huge problem with violence whether protesting or not.
-
How do you square that with her cancelling the speech based on the threat of violence?
-
If she wanted to speak she should have.
-
OK, thanks.
-
One of the hardest things about free speech is supporting the rights of people you despise and disagree with.
-
Undoubtedly. "Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection." - Neal Boortz
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trump is a master bully who resorts to playing the victim whenever his agenda fails
-
The vicim who never loses.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but it should grant freedom from violence and fear. the definition of terrorism - pushing your agenda through fear. shame on you berkeley
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When antifa thugs, aka professors, beat innocent people with bike locks, till they are bloodied and bandaged then the equation changes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's the problem with snowflake liberals. It's all okay when they get their way. When they don't, everyone else is right wing, racist etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are plenty of bullies to go around including the comment from the NYT reader...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Be clear. She wouldn't speak bc violence (more than ridicule) by protestors was being allowed by law enforcement. One side is using violence
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.