as he should have. This was good policy. He will be confirmed no matter the hatchet job by NYT.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gorsuch CAN'T be a NOMINEE! OBAMA ALREADY CHOSE REAL ONE!!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
unless we're talking about Merrick Garland, I don't want to hear another name when referring to an opening in the Supreme Court
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
let's waterboard him
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He will be faithful to Republicans of course. That means kissing Trumps butt!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely cannot afford to have him on SCOTUS with the current POTUS. No way. AND he's an originality!? No way.
-
"originalist". Damn auto-correct.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@nytimes Works for me. Confirmed!!!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Guantánamo is a dark stain on U.S. How can you argue 'unalienable human rights' by saying it depends on where a person is standing?
-
If thats so why did Obama keep it open?
-
Because the republican congress blocked attempts and passed legislation to prevent detainees from being brought to US?
-
Surely if Obama wanted it closed he would have found a way.
-
Please don't fault him for respecting the separation of powers and accepting the limitations of the Presidency.
-
Oh yes, he never pushed the limits...lol
-
He never called 4 the firing of federal judges because they ruled against him. Pushed the limits yes; respected them 2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds perfectly qualified to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.