He will be very embarrassed when he loses at the Supreme Court.
-
-
-
he wouldn't "win" or "lose" at the Supreme Court because he is not a litigant
-
don't bother. I doubt they know what litigant means anyway.
-
I know that it's pedantic.
-
shhh! You're confusing them.
-
It means he doesn't defend.But Trumps proposal will be upheld.Which means his loss
-
I thought she could figure that out without explanation. TY.

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He had a visit from Obama a few days before his ruling. How much money passed hands
-
not much more than the Russians pay for a puppet.
-
zero evidence, but the longer the left pushes that narrative the more credibility they lose!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
that's why you are not the judge and he is. People like you are the reason we need this judge.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Another helpful ruling towards a Muslim controlled America
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Placid Judge Vs Flaccid President
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Crooked Clintons News Network ganghttps://twitter.com/foxnews/status/842856914384048128 …
-
No different than what the Dems do to deflect the news off them
-
You mean like you are doing right now?



-
Right back at ya!


End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.