how low can you possibly get? Here it is. This is gross, vulgar, and demeaning to women everywhere.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmm.. and therefore peak human progress has arrived.. hmm..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that is not fashion!!! Now you're reporting
#fakenews on fashion??!! Do you have no limits??!!! -
what about this story is fake? Do you think they photoshopped the hats? What about this story isn't true?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
my god what a display of nonsense! hey but who needs hollywood movies, with this kinda crap to entertain us!!..LMAO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You got to be kidding. This is a clear sign of mental illness at it's best.



-
shame they won't be able to get care for 'mental illness' when
#ACA is repealed... but they can always buy a gun! -
That's highly unlikely. The
#ACA will be revamped for better & not repealed & or cancelled. People's fearing for nothing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
#MAGA such ignoranceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
those hats are really offensive.
-
women supporting Trump...are really offensive
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
absurd neo-feminism.
#Not my feminismThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is the news of the YEAR!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the organizer of the women's march has quite a history https://www.google.com/amp/nypost.com/2017/02/25/the-next-womens-march-is-co-organized-by-a-terrorist/amp/ …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
wow. How belittling to women. They are more than just sex objects with vagina heads! Shame on you New York Times. Sex slaves
-
How is the Times responsible for this hat created, named and displayed by Missoni?
-
well I guess because they are running a story about it that is pretty favorable. The hats are from the women's march
-
The Times is simply running the same story that other publications are. It's more about the fashion world in this context.

-
the story seems to more about the hats and then the actual fashion. So I'm thinking it's political fashion
-
Likely. Regardless, they're ugly little hats not worth people getting outraged over.
-
the outrage was a bit sarcastic
-
And over the top. Over hats, of all things. Smh.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.