your article/analysis is spot on. But the tweet is unnecessarily harsh, belittling
-
-
-
really? too harsh? what was the harsh part? reality bites.
-
normally I'd agree that it was low blow but this consistent incompetence needs to be emphasized.
-
totally agree. Just don't know how to handle "escalation". Know what I mean? Belittle me/belittle me....
-
really don't mean to belittle anyone other than horrible people
-
when they go low we go high. Again and again: content of article is great. Just the tweet
-
ok I think maybe I'm just being dense but specifically what is the harsh part. Still not getting it.
-
or maybe it is my English (German) : article is about content but tweet about their inability to turn light
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@soledadobrien The most dangerous and stupid White House in US recent history. -
But many are not getting it!
-
What do people need to really see to get it?
-
More chaos I suppose!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Hacks that write this rubbish obviously don't realise the contempt normal readers have for them. Bunch of Wankers
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
if there ever was a metaphor...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aren't you special?
-
Not nice to be rude to the special children.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
says the person without a real picture

-
Tweet unavailable
-
nice comeback, not
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.