.@nytimes Hobby Lobby objected to 4 specific items. Covered 19 methods. Also, they won. As they should have.
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
For the exact reason that they did. Because RFRA protects them.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Only if you don't know anything about SCOTUS history.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I'll go with Dred Scott and Buck v Bell. But sure. You be you.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
19 out of 23 types of birth control were covered, or are facts not that important to
@nytimes -
Hit the nail on the head. NYTimes has an agenda and presents false facts (lies) to further their agenda. Over&over.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Birth Control is something you can pick up @ your drug store. Why Should a Taxpayers pay for a life choice you decide to make?
-
reliability. Btw, BC is much cheaper than BIRTH.
-
100% reliability: Tie your "vasectomy" or "Tubal ligation." Adopt a child.
-
you're ridiculous. No wonder you voted in a maniac.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@nytimes US in interregnum; Trump not authorized to nominate anyone since US Constitution of 1789 not in effect; no consent to martial lawpic.twitter.com/XuqGrMWZib
-
Was usurped by the Patriot Act.
-
We are still operating under the Patriot Act at this time.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

