lock him up, lock him up...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the degree of hypocracye is astonishing!
-
I agree! The
@nytimes is hypocracye for downplaying the threat Hillary's unsecured served was to national security. -
It was on their front page several times, and is also specifically mentioned in this article
-
Please link to the NYT article where they specifically said her unsecured server was a threat to national security.
-
There are like hundreds, it was more important than the massive fraud and corruption by Trump https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html …
-
What do they mean by her "server was certainly no more vulnerable than the State Department’s"?pic.twitter.com/ZY8666hDFC
-
So they covered for Hillary again and again, but now suddenly Trump's phone is a massive security threat. Pa-leeze.
-
Yeah whatever guy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh, now you're concerned that an unsecured device is a security threat? Got it.pic.twitter.com/VOLMeNcB5x
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
where was your concern about security with Hillary? Can't stand the hypocrisy
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
His staff and admin are using private servers for government business, where is the outrage over that? Lock them up!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- Isn't
@POTUS a much bigger security threat than his flip phone? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@janet_yackle This jerk complained about HRCs secure server while now using an unsecured phone 2 tweet@realDonaldTrump is insane - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
LOCK HIM UP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.