Pass the headline to find out that the investigators "have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing." No news, in other words!
-
-
-
That wasn't good enough for you deplorables when that was said about HRC emails, silly little boy. Can you say Hypocrite?
-
So it is time of revenge? You want to be the deplorable now? Great!
-
Tweet unavailable
-
They just gave you one: "no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing" Skip the headline, get the facts straight
-
The investigation is ongoing, and will continue even if Trump's cohorts shut it down in US IC.
-
Straight up legit, untampered emails vs. innuendo and opinion? No comparison. @JbarOded @znakit
@Pattillotrish@nytimes -
Emails? You mean the ones that led to zero indictments?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Oh, but what about Hillary's emails? :)
-
Well, the Russian government has our Uranium thanks to Hillary. This cant be as bad.
-
You done with your fake news?
@nytimes - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but did he have a private server?
-
he did... and it was communicating with Russian banks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@nytimes and the so called "intelligence" agencies are going to regret this BS!pic.twitter.com/lKdw0YyzZg
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you just pull these stories out of a hat?
@nytimesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@McFaul Will this touch Trump if the men weren't on the campaign's payroll? They, weirdly, always mentioned Manafort volunteered. -
Excellent point!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.