If it was more I am sure Trump and Republicans would want credit. Any bad news in employment from now on will be Obama's fault
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Decent. Despite Trump's lies, there's no Trump boom. But strong recov overall under Obama: 15M jobs created
@nytimeshttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/817364232014544896 … - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Love the "tepid" wording...In 2008 how many jobs was Bush losing in December?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These stats clearly cover the additional seasonal/Christmas jobs not actual figure to state the work of presidential office
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Christmas hiring?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank u Pres Obama & team for your extraordinary efforts rebuilding US after financial collapse. God bless you all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
part time jobs?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
= FAKE News
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How many
#jobs removed due to#computers &#onlinebusiness ?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ummm- you say it's tepid in headline but then call it solid...Is 156,000 jobs solid or tepid?
-
tepid. strong numbers are 300-400,000 per month
-
welllll...since we have't seen 300-400K since booms in late 70s & mid 90s I think tepid is incorrect..esp with recession
-
mmm.. accdg to the labor dept, we had 300-400k back in the early-mid 2000s
-
Hmmm...U got a link for that data? Thanks.
-
adjust the category 2000-2016. scroll down to the chart at the bottom. on april 2005, 365k per mo. https://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet …
-
dont see how to adjust the category. You say the month of April 05 was 365K jobs? This is cited from BLS based on searchpic.twitter.com/5FcNySiqVi
-
not sure how you got that data, albeit correct but that is annual, cumulative. It's this one: monthly jobs data(2000-2016)pic.twitter.com/e8UbqTmkK9
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.