.@nytimes
Media spent 1 year+ using bad English: “Classified info” instead of “should have been marked classified”http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/18/us/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi.html …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Summary: 3 emails sent to Hillary yrs later classified. An unknown FBI member wanted 1 of the 3 emails available to public-denied
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@nytimes The "quid pro quo" offered by Clinton ally in State to FBI to protect Clinton, that's in the lede should be the headline.pic.twitter.com/hFH1j8eKpT
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is major spin! Learn ur job and research how documents are classified! Agencies don't debate classifications!
#TabloidThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, Kennedy proposed a quid pro quo.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That's not quite what the documents showed, but I guess beating around the bush was the best we could've expected from the NYT.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LOL!! That's the headline/tweet you chose for this story? Did you run that by Podesta to ask if it was ok?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If agencies can't tell between classified and unclassified documents they probably shouldn't be in business.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you're doing a great job of maintaining your 6% trust rate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.