Did you publish fact or hearsay?
-
-
-
Read it.
-
I did read it. Trying to find her facts that back up her story.
-
No. wait. That's not it either
-
but Clinton's are serial liars good at covering up all the wicked things they have done.
-
Let's check... Hmm. This article doesn't seem to be about the Clintons. One set of liars at a time, please
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's a truly beautiful response... to a bully. As a daily reader, all I have to say is: Thank you.
-
You might want to investigate the paper and the Clinton Found links and
#PodestaEmails@wikileaks ur being played -
Hahahaha When did they investigate Clinton? Oh yeah, before the sale.
-
The NYT has extensively covered WikiLeaks. But of course it doesn't paint the narrative you want
-
I don't need a narrative, I have truth. I don't need media to tell me what to think, I can research
-
gonna go see what breitbart is telling you to think?
-
I followed that mess for 3 years. GOP found nothing but lemmings who believe their conspiracy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@nytimes The great English judge Lord Bingham once said this in the Grobbelaar defamation case#Trumppic.twitter.com/8t7DdY1gH6
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Gotta love how they challenge
@realDonaldTrump with that "set him straight" line. That oughta draw him into the suicidal lawsuit. -
Either a suicidal lawsuit or a twitter rage. With the Donald it's all the same. :)
@nytimes@realDonaldTrump -
so true! and maybe we could have BOTH!!!
-
Someone should start a Trump "Twitter Rage" alert. I'd sign up for it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.